From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re NuVasive, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 10, 2017
2015-1839 (Fed. Cir. May. 10, 2017)

Opinion

2015-1838

05-10-2017

IN RE: NUVASIVE, INC., Appellant

MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANDREW SWANSON BROWN, SONJA ROCHELLE GERRARD; GRACE J. PAK, PAUL DAVID TRIPODI, II, Los Angeles, CA; RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC. SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00034.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANDREW SWANSON BROWN, SONJA ROCHELLE GERRARD; GRACE J. PAK, PAUL DAVID TRIPODI, II, Los Angeles, CA; RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC. SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, O'MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 10, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re NuVasive, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 10, 2017
2015-1839 (Fed. Cir. May. 10, 2017)
Case details for

In re NuVasive, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: NUVASIVE, INC., Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 10, 2017

Citations

2015-1839 (Fed. Cir. May. 10, 2017)