From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re N.R.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 22, 2021
No. 05-21-00742-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2021)

Opinion

05-21-00742-CV

09-22-2021

IN RE N.R. AND IRMA RAMIREZ (HEREINAFTER N.R. AND IRENE RAMIREZ), Relators


Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003-01130-2020

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LESLIE OSBORNE, JUSTICE

In their August 27, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus, relators challenge the trial court's August 19, 2021 order striking their section 18.001 counter-affidavit regarding the reasonableness of medical expenses. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135- 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude that relators have not shown they lack an adequate remedy. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, and deny their motion for temporary relief as moot.


Summaries of

In re N.R.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 22, 2021
No. 05-21-00742-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2021)
Case details for

In re N.R.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE N.R. AND IRMA RAMIREZ (HEREINAFTER N.R. AND IRENE RAMIREZ), Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

No. 05-21-00742-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2021)