In re Notre Dame

Full title: IN RE: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME, Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 12, 2022

No. 2021-2269 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2269

12-12-2022

IN RE: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME, Appellant

MARTIN JAMES COSENZA, II, Pilloff Passino &Cosenza LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant University of Notre Dame. Also represented by SEAN ALLEN PASSINO, RACHEL KAREN PILLOFF. PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/074,339.

MARTIN JAMES COSENZA, II, Pilloff Passino &Cosenza LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant University of Notre Dame. Also represented by SEAN ALLEN PASSINO, RACHEL KAREN PILLOFF.

PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

(REYNA, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.