Opinion
2021-2269
12-12-2022
IN RE: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME, Appellant
MARTIN JAMES COSENZA, II, Pilloff Passino &Cosenza LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant University of Notre Dame. Also represented by SEAN ALLEN PASSINO, RACHEL KAREN PILLOFF. PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/074,339.
MARTIN JAMES COSENZA, II, Pilloff Passino &Cosenza LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant University of Notre Dame. Also represented by SEAN ALLEN PASSINO, RACHEL KAREN PILLOFF.
PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM
(REYNA, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.