From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Norris

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 6, 2004
No. 02-04-047-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-047-CV

Delivered July 6, 2004.

Original Proceeding.

Michael Logan Ware, Fort Worth, TX, for relator.

William L. Kirkman, Bourland, Kirkman, Seidler, Jay Michel, LLP, Fort Worth, TX, for real parties in interest.

Panel B: WALKER, LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


The court has considered Relator's February 10, 2004 Petition For Writ Of Mandamus, Real Parties In Interest's March 1, 2004 Response To Petition For Writ Of Mandamus, Relator's March 8, 2004 Reply To Response To Petition For Writ Of Mandamus, Real Parties In Interest's June 17, 2004 Supplemental Mandamus Response To Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Advising The Court Of Recent Activity In The Trial Court, and Real Parties In Interest's July 2, 2004 Second Supplemental Response To Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Advising The Court Of Recent Activity In The Trial Court, and is of the opinion that relator's petition for writ of mandamus should be denied as moot.

Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a).

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

In re Norris

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 6, 2004
No. 02-04-047-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2004)
Case details for

In re Norris

Case Details

Full title:IN RE WIRT M. NORRIS, JR. Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 6, 2004

Citations

No. 02-04-047-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2004)