From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Nomula

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 18, 2017
2016-2735 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 18, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2735

09-18-2017

IN RE: JAGADESHWAR REDDY NOMULA, Appellant

JUNDONG MA, JDM Patent Law PLLC, Riverdale Park, MD, argued for appellant. FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH GERARD PICCOLO.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/208,338.

JUDGMENT

JUNDONG MA, JDM Patent Law PLLC, Riverdale Park, MD, argued for appellant. FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH GERARD PICCOLO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 18, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Nomula

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 18, 2017
2016-2735 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 18, 2017)
Case details for

In re Nomula

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JAGADESHWAR REDDY NOMULA, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 18, 2017

Citations

2016-2735 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 18, 2017)