From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Nixon

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 20, 2022
No. 05-22-00021-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00021-CV

01-20-2022

IN RE TRACY NIXON, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMANDA L. REICHEK, JUSTICE

In this original proceeding, relator is a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under chapter 11 of the civil practice and remedies code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.101. He challenges the Local Administrative Judge's order denying his request for permission to file new litigation.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Nixon

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 20, 2022
No. 05-22-00021-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

In re Nixon

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TRACY NIXON, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00021-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 20, 2022)