From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Newman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Feb 7, 2008
No. 14-08-00064-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2008)

Opinion

No. 14-08-00064-CV

Opinion filed February 7, 2008.

Original Proceeding Writ of Mandamus.

Panel consists of Justices YATES, GUZMAN, and BROWN.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On January 29, 2008, relator, Lionel Newman, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to allow him discovery and inspection of the State's evidence because he was denied access to the evidence prior to trial.

Relator seeks post-conviction habeas relief. Although courts of appeals have jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final post-conviction felony proceedings. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (orig. proceeding).

Because we do not have jurisdiction over the requested relief, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed. Relator's motions for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus and to suspend Rule 9.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure are further ordered denied as moot.


Summaries of

In re Newman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Feb 7, 2008
No. 14-08-00064-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2008)
Case details for

In re Newman

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LIONEL NEWMAN, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Feb 7, 2008

Citations

No. 14-08-00064-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2008)

Citing Cases

In re Zarychta

Id. Mandamus relief in a post-conviction habeas proceeding must be obtained from the Court of Criminal…

In re Whitaker

Mandamus relief relating to a post-conviction habeas proceeding must be obtained from the Court of Criminal…