From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Netflix, Inc., Sec. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 28, 2013
Case No.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC

03-28-2013

In re NETFLIX, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation Rodney G. Strickland Attorneys for Defendants Netflix Inc., Reed Hastings, David Wells, and Barry McCarthy LABATON SUCHAROW LLP Jonathan M. Plasse Stephen W. Tountas Serena Hallowell Stephen W. Tountas Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs


KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842
Email: keggleton@wsgr.com
BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838
Email: boris.feldman@wsgr.com
RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, State Bar No. 161934
Email: rstrickland@wsgr.com
LUKE A. LISS, State Bar No. 247520
Email: lliss@wsgr.com
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
Attorneys for Defendants
Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, David Wells, and
Barry McCarthy

CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

WHEREAS, lead plaintiffs Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and State-Boston Retirement System ("Lead Plaintiffs") filed the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "Complaint") against defendants Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, David Wells, and Barry McCarthy (collectively, "Defendants") on March 22, 2013;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(d) and 15(a)(3), Defendants' response to the Complaint is to be filed on or before April 8, 2013;

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss the Complaint (the "Motion to Dismiss");

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree that setting an appropriate schedule regarding the Motion to Dismiss and related briefing is in the best interest of the parties;

THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned, as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before April 24, 2013.

2. Lead Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before May 24, 2013.

3. Defendants' reply memorandum shall be filed on or before June 7, 2013.

4. Prior to the filing of the Motion to Dismiss, the parties shall meet and confer regarding a hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss that is convenient for the parties and the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: ________

Rodney G. Strickland

Attorneys for Defendants Netflix Inc., Reed

Hastings, David Wells, and Barry McCarthy

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP

Jonathan M. Plasse

Stephen W. Tountas Serena Hallowell

By: ________

Stephen W. Tountas

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs I, Rodney G. Strickland, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the Stephen W. Tountas has concurred in this filing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER


PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before April 24, 2013.

2. Lead Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before May 24, 2013.

3. Defendants' reply memorandum shall be filed on or before June 7, 2013.

4. Prior to the filing of the Motion to Dismiss, the parties shall meet and confer regarding a hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss that is convenient for the parties and the Court.

__________________

Honorable Samuel Conti

United States District Judge


Summaries of

In re Netflix, Inc., Sec. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 28, 2013
Case No.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2013)
Case details for

In re Netflix, Inc., Sec. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re NETFLIX, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2013)