From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Nelson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jul 30, 2021
No. 03-21-00340-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2021)

Opinion

03-21-00340-CV

07-30-2021

In re Ardell Danny Nelson Junior


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS J. BAKER, JUSTICE.

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court's purported failure to rule on his motion for forensic DNA testing. Although mandamus relief is available when the trial court has failed to rule on a properly filed motion within a reasonable length of time, see In re Whitfield, No. 03-18-00564-CV, 2018 WL 4140735, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin Aug. 29, 2018, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.), such relief is inapplicable here because the trial court has already denied the motion, see In re Martinez, No. 04-14-00293-CR, 2014 WL 2548571, at *1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio June 4, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (holding that a "failure to rule" issue becomes moot once the trial court has acted). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.


Summaries of

In re Nelson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jul 30, 2021
No. 03-21-00340-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2021)
Case details for

In re Nelson

Case Details

Full title:In re Ardell Danny Nelson Junior

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Jul 30, 2021

Citations

No. 03-21-00340-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2021)