Opinion
No. 10-14-00125-CR
05-29-2014
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
The petition for writ of mandamus has numerous procedural deficiencies; it lacks most of the contents required by Rule 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. It does not include the certification required by Rule 52.3(j). See id. 52.3(j). It lacks an appendix and a record. See id. 52.3(k), 52.7. And the petition lacks proof of service on the Respondent trial judge and on the Navarro County District Attorney, a Real-Party-in-Interest. See id. 9.5, 52.2. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties to the proceeding and must contain proof of service. Id. 9.5. Because of our disposition and to expedite it, we will implement Rule 2 and suspend these rules. Id. 2.
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Petition denied
Do not publish
[OT06]