From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Nelson

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 9, 2013
NO. 03-12-00618-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 03-12-00618-CV

08-09-2013

In re Ardell Nelson, Jr.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus largely complaining that the district clerk and the district court had not properly prepared the record in an appeal filed from the district court's denial of relator's motion for DNA testing. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. The documents relator seeks to have added to the file are not necessary to the appeal, however, and relator has not shown that the district clerk or the district court have violated their ministerial duties or orders issued by this Court. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

_________________

David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin


Summaries of

In re Nelson

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 9, 2013
NO. 03-12-00618-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2013)
Case details for

In re Nelson

Case Details

Full title:In re Ardell Nelson, Jr.

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Aug 9, 2013

Citations

NO. 03-12-00618-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2013)