From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Nance

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Oct 27, 2005
No. 08-05-00320-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2005)

Opinion

No. 08-05-00320-CR

October 27, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

An Original Proceeding in Mandamus.

Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.


OPINION


Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court has failed to act on his post-conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus. This Court does not have jurisdiction over matters related to post-conviction writs of habeas corpus. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991; In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding. The Court of Criminal Appeals has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus when the trial court fails to act on a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See, e.g., Martin v. Hamlin, 25 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000; McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992. The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re Nance

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Oct 27, 2005
No. 08-05-00320-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2005)
Case details for

In re Nance

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: LEONARD LEON NANCE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Oct 27, 2005

Citations

No. 08-05-00320-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2005)