The Attorney for the Children contends only that the court should have ordered the father to obtain sexual offender treatment. Inasmuch as that contention involves a challenge to the dispositional part of the order and the order has expired by its terms, we conclude that the appeal by the Attorney for the Children must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Myisha B., 73 A.D.3d 625, 900 N.Y.S.2d 863; Matter of Chelsea M., 61 A.D.3d 1030, 1032, 876 N.Y.S.2d 222).
The Attorney for the Children contends only that the court should have ordered the father to obtain sexual offender treatment. Inasmuch as that contention involves a challenge to the dispositional part of the order and the order has expired by its terms, we conclude that the appeal by the Attorney for the Children must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Myisha B. , 73 AD3d 625; Matter ofChelsea M. , 61 AD3d 1030, 1032).