From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 7, 2013
103 A.D.3d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-7

In the Matter of Michael A. MURPHY, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Michael A. Murphy, Respondent.


Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner.

Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., SPAIN, McCARTHY, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997. He resides in Massachusetts.

The Supreme Court of Massachusetts, by order entered September 17, 2012, suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. Respondent had billed more hours than necessary during his representation of two clients in order to increase his billable hours at the law firm which employed him, in violation of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5(a) and 8.4(c).

Petitioner moves for an order imposing discipline in accordance with our rules ( see22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied to the motion.

We grant petitioner's motion and further conclude that respondent should also be suspended in this state for a period of one year.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys ( see22 NYCRR 806.9).

LAHTINEN, J.P., SPAIN, McCARTHY, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 7, 2013
103 A.D.3d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

In re Murphy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael A. MURPHY, an Attorney. Committee on Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

103 A.D.3d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 787
958 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

In re Engelhart

As a result of the discipline imposed in New Jersey, the Committee on Professional Standards moves for an…

In re Engelhart

As a result of the discipline imposed in New Jersey, the Committee on Professional Standards moves for an…