From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mulder

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 15, 2011
205 N.J. 71 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

February 15, 2011.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-212, concluding that WILLIAM H. MULDER of SADDLEBROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 4.1(a)(1) (misrepresentation of material fact to a third person), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM H. MULDER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Mulder

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 15, 2011
205 N.J. 71 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

In re Mulder

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM H. MULDER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 15, 2011

Citations

205 N.J. 71 (N.J. 2011)
12 A.3d 205

Citing Cases

In re Yannon

See, e.g., In re Barrett, 207 N.J. 34 (2011) (attorney reprimanded for misrepresenting that a RESPA statement…

In re Yannon

See, e.g., In re Barrett, 207 N.J. 34 (2011) (attorney reprimanded for misrepresenting that a RESPA statement…