From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mtr. of Rivers v. Farms

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 18, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 99361.

January 18, 2007.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed August 11, 2005, which, inter alia, required claimant to produce additional documentary evidence to support his claim for workers' compensation benefits.

David Rivers, New York City, appellant pro se.

Gregory J. Allen, State Insurance Fund, New York City (Charlotte Flynn of counsel), for State Insurance Fund and another, respondents.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Iris A. Steel of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


In 1985, claimant was involved in a work-related accident resulting in injuries to his neck, head and back. In connection with his application for workers' compensation benefits, the Workers' Compensation Board classified claimant with a permanent partial disability and awarded him benefits. In a 2004 decision, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) agreed with a prior Board decision that the only issues remaining in claimant's case were the alleged underpayment or late payment of claimant's deficiency compensation. The WCLJ noted that to accurately calculate this compensation, claimant needed to produce copies of medical billing statements and cancelled checks and receipts showing that he had personally paid for medical treatment related to this claim. The Board adopted and affirmed the WCLJ's decision regarding the need for additional evidence and a hearing and continued claimant's case. Claimant appeals.

As the Board's decision was interlocutory in nature, did not decide substantive issues and did not involve a threshold legal question, that decision is not appealable ( see Matter of Sawyer v Orange Motors, 24 AD3d 1117, 1117; Matter of Reese v Advanced Empl. Concepts, 15 AD3d 760, 761). It would be inappropriate for this Court to undertake a review of the Board's decision when the Board itself has withheld a final determination pending further development of the record ( see Matter of Bush v Beltrone Constr., 289 AD2d 722, 723). Claimant must proceed to a final determination by the Board to raise any challenge to this nonfinal decision ( see Matter of Sawyer v Orange Motors, supra at 1118).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Mtr. of Rivers v. Farms

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 18, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Mtr. of Rivers v. Farms

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DAVID RIVERS, Appellant, v. BLUE RIDGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 18, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 368
829 N.Y.S.2d 245

Citing Cases

Monzon v. Sam

The employer appeals. This interlocutory Board decision is not appealable because it neither disposes of all…

Claim of Zaldivar v. SNS Organization

In order to avoid piecemeal review of workers' compensation cases, a Board decision that “is interlocutory in…