Opinion
No. 911 Disciplinary Docket Number No. 2.
September 28, 2004.
No. 911 Disciplinary Docket, No. 2 — Supreme Court (No. 34 RST 2004), No. 78 DB 1992 — Disciplinary Board, Attorney Registration No. 27325, (Philadelphia).
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated June 22, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is DENIED.
Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.