From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Modern Woodmen of Am.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 10, 2017
2016-2306 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2306

04-10-2017

IN RE: MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA, Appellant

THOMAS JOSEPH MOORE, Bacon & Thomas, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS LEE. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, CHRISTINA HIEBER, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 86/125,313.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS JOSEPH MOORE, Bacon & Thomas, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS LEE. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, CHRISTINA HIEBER, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 10, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Modern Woodmen of Am.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 10, 2017
2016-2306 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2017)
Case details for

In re Modern Woodmen of Am.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 10, 2017

Citations

2016-2306 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2017)