In re M.L.R.

12 Citing cases

  1. In re M.C.M.

    No. 05-21-00242-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2023)

    (mem. op.); In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *2 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.);

  2. Wade v. Vertical Comput. Sys.

    No. 05-22-00454-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 27, 2023)

    In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *3 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.);

  3. In re M.C.M.

    No. 05-21-00242-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 26, 2023)

    (mem. op.); In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *2 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.);

  4. In re M.C.M.

    No. 05-21-00242-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2023)

    (mem. op.); In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *2 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.);

  5. In re A.M.S.

    No. 05-22-00860-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 2, 2023)

    Appellant is incorrect. The temporary orders were rendered moot by the entry of the final divorce decree, see In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *2 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (internal citations omitted), and no claims remained pending once the trial court signed the decree.

  6. In re B.W.S.

    No. 05-20-00343-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 13, 2022)

    It is well-settled that a temporary order is superseded by entry of a final order, rendering moot any complaint about the temporary order. In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *2 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.)

  7. In re B.W.S.

    No. 05-20-00343-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2022)

    It is well-settled that a temporary order is superseded by entry of a final order, rendering moot any complaint about the temporary order. In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *2 (Tex. App.-Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.)

  8. In re Of

    No. 05-18-00577-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 28, 2019)

    A final judgment does not strictly comply with a settlement agreement when the trial court's judgment adds terms, significantly alters the original terms, or undermines the intent of the parties. In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.). 1. Health insurance

  9. In re Marriage of Russell

    556 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. App. 2018)   Cited 20 times
    In Matter of Marriage of Russell, 556 S.W.3d 451, 461 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, no pet.), our sister court reversed the judgment nunc pro tunc as void and reinstated the original final divorce decree.

    However, Texas appellate courts, including this one, consistently have held otherwise. SeeIn re M.L.R. , No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) ; Brantley v. Brantley , No. 14-11-00583-CV, 2012 WL 727700, at *2–3 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 6, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); Murphy v. Leveille , No. 2-08-130-CV, 2009 WL 2619857, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 26, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam); Barina v. Barina , No. 03-08-00341-CV, 2008 WL 4951224, at *2–3 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 21, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.); cf.Matter of Marriage of Harrison , 557 S.W.3d 99, 137–38, No. 14-15-00430-CV, 2018 WL 2926268, at *29 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 12, 2018, no pet. h.) (indicating that party would need to "properly and timely present[ ]" any motion to enter judgment on MSA in trial court for purposes of preservation).See alsoPaisley , 2000 WL 19660, at *2 (rejecting wife’s argument that she had a right to judgment on MSA under sections 6.602 and 153.0071 of Family Code despite expiration of plenary power).

  10. In re Marriage of Harrison

    NO. 14-15-00430-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 12, 2018)   Cited 3 times

    However, because the trial court entered a final judgment, temporary orders are moot and not subject to appellate review. See In re M.L.R., No. 05-15-00647-CV, 2016 WL 5791530, at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 4, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) ("It is well-settled a temporary order is superseded by entry of a final order, rendering moot any complaint about the temporary order."); In re D.W., Nos. 01-13-00880-CV, 01-13-00883-CV, 01-13-00884-CV, 2014 WL 1494290, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 11, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.).