From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mithum

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 16, 1998
737 So. 2d 1 (La. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-B-3046

December 16, 1998

IN RE: Mithum, Richard James; Disciplinary Counsel; — Plaintiff(s); Joint Petition for Interim Suspension;


Petition for interim suspension granted. See order.

JPV

PFC

CDK

BJJ

CDT

JTK

MARCUS, J. not on panel.

ORDER

Considering the foregoing Joint Petition for Interim Suspension:

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Richard James Mithum, attorney at law, be and hereby is, placed on interim suspension from the practice of law, said suspension to be effective immediately, and remaining in effect until further orders of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that from the date of the filing of the petition until the effective date of the interim suspension, respondent shall not undertake the representation of new clients and shall fully comply with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26.

The office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to institute appropriate disciplinary proceedings pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 16th day of December, 1998.

MARCUS, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.


Summaries of

In re Mithum

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 16, 1998
737 So. 2d 1 (La. 1998)
Case details for

In re Mithum

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: RICHARD JAMES MITHUM

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Dec 16, 1998

Citations

737 So. 2d 1 (La. 1998)