From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 2010
74 A.D.3d 1678 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 508429.

June 24, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Kevin Mitchell, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Stein and McCarthy, JJ.


Petitioner sent a handwritten letter to a female librarian at the correctional facility where he was incarcerated professing his love, describing his genitals and offering to engage in sex. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with solicitation, harassment and committing a sexual offense. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the handwritten letter and handwriting samples produced during the hearing, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Mills v Fischer, 65 AD3d 1427, 1427; Matter of Haden v Prack, 62 AD3d 1133, 1134). Petitioner's claim that the letter must have been composed by another inmate or staff member was not substantiated at the hearing and presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Koehl v Fischer, 52 AD3d 1070, 1071, appeal dismissed 11 NY3d 809; Matter of Moore v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 50 AD3d 1350, 1351). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and are lacking in merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 2010
74 A.D.3d 1678 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KEVIN MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM BROWN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 24, 2010

Citations

74 A.D.3d 1678 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5640
902 N.Y.S.2d 454

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Brown

Decided November 18, 2010. Appeal from the 3d Dept: 74 AD3d 1678. Motions for Leave to Appeal…

In re Fruitquan Bailey

To the extent that petitioner argues a lack of substantial evidence to support the remaining charges, the…