From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 26, 1996
234 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 26, 1996.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's request for disability retirement benefits.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Peters, JJ.


There is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent's finding that petitioner failed to sustain her burden of proving that she was permanently incapacitated from performing her duties as a Social Worker Assistant II at a psychiatric center. While there was some conflict in the testimony given by petitioner's treating chiropractor and that of the orthopedic surgeon who testified on behalf of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System, it lies within respondent's authority to evaluate conflicting medical evidence and to accept the opinion of one expert medical witness over that of another ( see, Matter of Longendyke v Regan, 195 AD2d 695, 696). Respondent's determination is accordingly confirmed. Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 26, 1996
234 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BARBARA J. MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 26, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 951

Citing Cases

Matter of Bilodeau v. McCall

Significantly, respondent credited the opinion of the medical expert who testified on behalf of the New York…