From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Milton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jun 6, 2013
67 A.3d 556 (D.C. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13–BG–67.

2013-06-6

In re Gregory MILTON, Respondent.


Bar Registration No. 978857, BDN: 28–13.
BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and TERRY and STEADMAN, Senior Judges.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland, with the right to seek reinstatement after 90 days, this court's February 28, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of an indefinite suspension with the right to apply for reinstatement in 90 days, with reinstatement conditioned on the showing of fitness, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause but did file an affidavitas required by D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on May 17, 2013, it is

ORDERED that Gregory Milton is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia with the right to seek reinstatement after 90 days, nunc pro tunc to May 17, 2013. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See, In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007).


Summaries of

In re Milton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jun 6, 2013
67 A.3d 556 (D.C. 2013)
Case details for

In re Milton

Case Details

Full title:In re Gregory MILTON, Respondent.

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

67 A.3d 556 (D.C. 2013)

Citing Cases

In re Milton

PER CURIAM On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely…