From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mike Meier of Columbia Court of Appeals

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Sep 7, 2017
168 A.3d 691 (D.C. 2017)

Opinion

No. 17–BG–566

09-07-2017

IN RE Mike MEIER A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals


ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspending respondent from the practice of law for thirty days by agreed disposition; this court's June 9, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court's show cause order; and it further appearing that respondent provided a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit to Disciplinary Counsel on June 27, 2017, but failed to file a copy in this court as required, it is

ORDERED that Mike Meier is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of thirty days. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483, 487–88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in "rare" cases); In re Cole , 809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 2002) (explaining that in unopposed reciprocal matters the "imposition of identical discipline should be close to automatic"). For purposes of reinstatement, the suspension will not begin to run until such time as respondent files his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit in this court.


Summaries of

In re Mike Meier of Columbia Court of Appeals

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Sep 7, 2017
168 A.3d 691 (D.C. 2017)
Case details for

In re Mike Meier of Columbia Court of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Mike MEIER A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Sep 7, 2017

Citations

168 A.3d 691 (D.C. 2017)