From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mickens v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1996
232 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 15, 1996.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Marvin I. Goodman, Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to release to him a presentence report prepared by the County of Nassau, Probation Department.

Before: Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Sullivan and Hart, JJ.


Motion by the respondent, Marvin I. Goodman, to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is,

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further, Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

In re Mickens v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1996
232 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Mickens v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DERRICK MICKENS, Petitioner, v. MARVIN I. GOODMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 339