From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Michel

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 26, 2024
24-cv-03395-EKL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-03395-EKL

08-26-2024

MICHEL, Plaintiff, v. Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Eumi K. Lee United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a Florida federal prisoner proceeding pro se, sent a letter to the Court regarding prison conditions. In an effort to protect his rights, the Court treated the letter as a complaint and opened a new case. Plaintiff was sent a notice stating that he had not paid the filing fee, submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or submitted a formal complaint. He was provided twenty-eight days to comply.

More than twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not submitted any of these filings. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, and no fee is due. If plaintiff wishes to initiate a court case, he must file a formal complaint and pay the filing fee or submit a complete application to proceed IFP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Michel

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 26, 2024
24-cv-03395-EKL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2024)
Case details for

In re Michel

Case Details

Full title:MICHEL, Plaintiff, v. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 26, 2024

Citations

24-cv-03395-EKL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2024)