Opinion
E032593.
7-31-2003
In re MELVIN B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MELVIN B., Defendant and Appellant.
Patrick E. DuNah, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On August 7, 2002, a juvenile wardship subsequent petition was filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 602 and 777, subdivision a, by the San Bernardino County District Attorney, which alleged violations by Melvin B. (minor) of Penal Code sections 211 and 148, subdivision (a)(1), robbery and resisting arrest (counts 1 and 2).
On September 20, 2002, at the conclusion of a jurisdictional hearing, the court found to be true and sustained the allegations set forth in counts 1 and 2 of the August 7th subsequent petition. Thereafter, on October 10, 2002, minor was continued as "a ward of the court" pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 and "care, custody and control to continue with the probation officer," with custody of minor to be returned to his parents upon completion of 67 to 134 days in juvenile hall.
Defendant appealed and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 158 Cal. Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493], setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record. We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: McKINSTER, J., RICHLI, J.