From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Joseph

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 25, 2017
153 A.3d 226 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

01-25-2017

In the MATTER OF Danielle M. JOSEPH, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 026982001)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16–003, concluding on the record certified by the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f)(default by respondent) that DANIELLE M. JOSEPH of PISCATAWAY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIELLE M. JOSEPH is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Joseph

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 25, 2017
153 A.3d 226 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

In re Joseph

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Danielle M. JOSEPH, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 25, 2017

Citations

153 A.3d 226 (N.J. 2017)
153 A.3d 226