From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Medina v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 30, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93666

Decided and Entered: October 30, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Anthony Medina, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance, making threats and a movement violation. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references to the proceeding have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Maldonado v. Goord, 296 A.D.2d 807).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Medina v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 30, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Medina v. Senkowski

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY MEDINA, Petitioner, v. DANIEL A. SENKOWSKI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Moore v. Cunningham

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…