From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re McMillan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
21-cv-05434-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-05434-PJH

09-07-2021

WILLIAM M. MCMILLAN, Plaintiff,


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case was opened when plaintiff, a New Jersey state prisoner proceeding pro se, wrote a letter to the court. In an effort to protect his rights, it was filed as a new case. Plaintiff was informed that he had not filed a complaint and was given twenty-eight days to do so. He also was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”); again, he was allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice. Twenty-eight days has passed and plaintiff has not submitted any filing or otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. No. fee is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re McMillan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
21-cv-05434-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

In re McMillan

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM M. MCMILLAN, Plaintiff,

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

21-cv-05434-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)