From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mckenna

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 27, 2002
799 A.2d 1288 (N.J. 2002)

Opinion

June 27, 2002


ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-10-(b) following a motion for discipline by consent of KEITH A. McKENNA of MORRISTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989;

And respondent having signed an affidavit of consent in which he acknowledged that his conduct violated RPC 1.2(a) (failure to abide by a client's decision) and RPC 1.3 (failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representation of client);

And the partieshaving agreed that respondent's unethical conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reviewed the record pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(b)(3) to determine the appropriate measure of discipline for respondent's misconduct;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's ethics and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

And the Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20-16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KEITH A. McKENNA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Mckenna

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 27, 2002
799 A.2d 1288 (N.J. 2002)
Case details for

In re Mckenna

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF KEITH A MCKENNA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 27, 2002

Citations

799 A.2d 1288 (N.J. 2002)
799 A.2d 1288

Citing Cases

In re Speziale

, In the Matter of John S. Giava, DRB 01-455 (March 15, 2002) (admonition imposed on attorney who was hired…