From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Securities Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Apr 26, 2010
C-08-00832-JW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2010)

Opinion

          BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP. BLAIR A. NICHOLAS, TIMOTHY A. DELANGE, San Diego, CA. CHITWOOD HARLEY HARNES LLP, MARTIN D. CHITWOOD (Pro Hac Vice), JAMES M. WILSON, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice), Atlanta, GA. -and- GREGORY E. KELLER (Pro Hac Vice), Great Neck, New York, Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class Representatives.

          WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP. JOHN A. NEUWIRTH (Pro Hac Vice), New York, NY. -and- GREGORY D. HULL, Redwood Shores, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

          LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP. DAVID M. FRIEDMAN, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Carl W. Jasper.

          SONNENBLICK, PARKER & SELVERS, P.C. JEROME M. SELVERS, Freehold Executive Center, Freehold, NJ, Attorneys for Defendant The Estate of John F. Gifford.

          O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP. MEREDITH M. LANDY, Menlo Park, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Timothy Ruehle.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON LEAD PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

          JAMES WARE, District Judge.

         WHEREAS, by Order dated October 1, 2009, the Court scheduled a hearing on Lead Plaintiffs' motion for class certification for April 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.;

         WHEREAS, on December 11, 2009, Lead Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification;

         WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation among the parties and by Order dated March 5, 2010, the Court extended the briefing and hearing dates on Lead Plaintiffs' motion for class certification pursuant to which Maxim's opposition to Lead Plaintiffs' motion for class certification would be filed on March 26, 2010, Lead Plaintiffs' reply in further support of the motion would be filed on April 23, 2010 and the hearing on the motion would be on May 24, 2010;

         WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the date for Lead Plaintiffs' reply in further support of their motion for class certification to June 18, 2010;

         WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, subject to the Court's approval, to continue the May 24, 2010 hearing on Lead Plaintiffs' motion for class certification to July 12, 2010; and

         WHEREAS, there has been one prior request to continue the hearing on Lead Plaintiffs' motion for class certification;

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel, that Lead Plaintiffs' reply in further support of their motion for class certification shall be filed on June 18, 2010 and the hearing on Lead Plaintiffs' motion for class certification presently scheduled for May 24, 2010 shall be continued to July 12, 2010.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from John A. Neuwirth, David M. Friedman, Jerome M. Selvers, and Meredith M. Landy.

         ORDER

         The Court finds good cause to grant the parties' a continuance of the hearing on the Motions. This is the final continuance.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Securities Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Apr 26, 2010
C-08-00832-JW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2010)
Case details for

In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Apr 26, 2010

Citations

C-08-00832-JW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2010)