In re Maude

2 Citing cases

  1. Malak v. State

    116 A.D.3d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 5 times

    The penalty of license revocation imposed by the ALJ does not shock the conscience ( see Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321 [1974] ). The existence of intermittent gaps in the record created by inaudible portions of the hearing transcript did not deprive petitioner of her right to meaningful review of the record ( see Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin, 167 A.D.2d 671, 563 N.Y.S.2d 248 [3d Dept.1990]; cf.Maude V. v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 75 A.D.3d 691, 692, 905 N.Y.S.2d 676 [3d Dept.2010] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

  2. Maude V. v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services

    82 A.D.3d 1468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 179 times

    This appeal by claimant ensued. In the interim, claimant commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge defendant's determination and, following transfer of that proceeding to this Court ( Matter of Maude V. v New York State Off. of Children Family Servs., 75 AD3d 691 [2010]), the parties apparently stipulated to "vacate and seal" the underlying record. We affirm.