From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Matter of Dakota B. v. Brigitta B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 2010
73 A.D.3d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 2009-00478, Docket No. N-2289-07.

May 4, 2010.

In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), dated November 21, 2008, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she neglected the subject child and, inter alia, placed the child with the father.

Patricia Zugibe, County Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Thomas Dimick of counsel), for respondent.

Christopher Widholm, New City, N.Y., attorney for the child.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

At all six court appearances scheduled for a fact-finding hearing, the mother requested an adjournment, citing unsubstantiated medical issues, as well as personal issues, and a need for more time to prepare her case. The Family Court granted several of the mother's adjournment requests, extending the case from March to August 2008, but declined to grant another adjournment on August 14, 2008. Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court's decision to deny the mother's request for another adjournment was not an improvident exercise of discretion ( see Matter of Steven B., 6 NY3d 888, 889; Matter of Holmes v Glover, 68 AD3d 868, 869; Diamond v Diamante, 57 AD3d 826, 827-828; Matter of Paulino v Camacho, 36 AD3d 821, 822).


Summaries of

In re Matter of Dakota B. v. Brigitta B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 2010
73 A.D.3d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Matter of Dakota B. v. Brigitta B

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAKOTA B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. ROCKLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3918
899 N.Y.S.2d 631

Citing Cases

T10 Funding v. Baroda Props., Inc.

On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the JHO abused his discretion by denying the adjournment request. An…

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. James K. (In re Demetrious L.K.)

N.Y.2d 270, 283, 481 N.Y.S.2d 675, 471 N.E.2d 447 ; seeMatter of Angie N.W. [Melvin A.W.], 107 A.D.3d 907,…