From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Maskall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 7, 2021
198 A.D.3d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

PM–129–21

10-07-2021

In the MATTER OF Aurora Maria MASKALL, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 2427011)

Aurora Maria Maskall, Cheney, Washington, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Aurora Maria Maskall, Cheney, Washington, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.

Aurora Maria Maskall was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991 and lists a business address in Cheney, Washington with the Office of Court Administration. Maskall now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Maskall is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for the biennial period beginning in 2021 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). Inasmuch as Maskall is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5] ; Rules of Professional Conduct [ 22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014] ), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Maskall must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Aurora Maria Maskall's application for permission to resign is denied.


Summaries of

In re Maskall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 7, 2021
198 A.D.3d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

In re Maskall

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Aurora Maria MASKALL, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 7, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 636