From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 20, 2024
No. 05-24-00801-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 20, 2024)

Opinion

05-24-00801-CV

08-20-2024

IN RE SANTIAGO MARTINEZ, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-18712

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS, JUSTICE

In his July 3, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from the trial court's denial of his motion to modify temporary orders.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator's petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Additionally, based on our review, relator's petition and its attached appendix contain unredacted sensitive data-such as a minor's full name-in violation of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9. Accordingly, we strike relator's petition and its attached appendix.


Summaries of

In re Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 20, 2024
No. 05-24-00801-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 20, 2024)
Case details for

In re Martinez

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SANTIAGO MARTINEZ, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Aug 20, 2024

Citations

No. 05-24-00801-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 20, 2024)