In re Martin

Full title: IN RE KENNETH A. MARTIN, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 420600

Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 21, 2014

No. 11-BG-775 (D.C. Oct. 21, 2014)

Opinion

No. 11-BG-775

10-21-2014

IN RE KENNETH A. MARTIN, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 420600

PER CURIAM.

BDN: 370-04 BEFORE: Fisher and Blackburne-Rigsby, Associate Judges and King, Senior Judge. ORDER

On consideration of respondent's consent motion for "Expedited Clarification of Reinstatement Conditions," and whereas the opinion suspending respondent from the practice of law did not require "proof of rehabilitation" pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI § 16 (d), it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted. This court's opinion, first issued on March 28, 2013 (reported at 67 A.3d 1032) and amended February 13, 2014 (amendment reported at 91 A.3d 564), which, in its very last sentence, conditioned reinstatement "upon compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI § 16 (d)," will be amended. Instead, the last sentence will condition reinstatement "upon compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI § 16 (c)."

PER CURIAM.

Copies to: Daniel S. Schumack, Esquire
3900 Jermantown Road, Suite 300
Fairfax, VA 22030-4900
Eric L. Yaffe, Esquire
Chair, Board on Professional Responsibility
430 E Street, N.W., Suite 138
Washington, D.C. 20001
Wallace E. Shipp, Jr., Esquire
Bar Counsel, Office of Bar Counsel
515 5^th Street, N.W., Suite 117
Washington, D.C. 20001