In re Marriage of Papazian

Full title: In re the Marriage of GILBERT II and AMY LYNN PAPAZIAN. v. AMY LYNN…

Court: California Court of Appeals, First District, Second Division

Date published: May 18, 2009

A114961, A116750, A117270 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 18, 2009)

Opinion

In re the Marriage of GILBERT II and AMY LYNN PAPAZIAN. GILBERT PAPAZIAN II, Respondent, v. AMY LYNN PAPAZIAN, Appellant. A114961, A116750, A117270 California Court of Appeal, First District, Second Division May 18, 2009

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. FL071764

Haerle, Acting P.J.

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 22, 2009, be modified as follows:

The first paragraph on page 14 of the opinion shall be deleted and replaced with the following: “Amy also argues that the trial court erred because it did not permit her adequate discovery prior to the hearing on the child support matters. We disagree. To the extent that the court did not rule directly on this issue, we presume the court denied her request. The documents Amy requested either predated the marital settlement agreement and/or were not relevant to the issue of child support. Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Amy’s efforts to compel these documents. (Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Superior Court (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 772, 779.)”

This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.