Opinion
A178240
12-14-2022
In the Matter of the Marriage of Violetta Alexander COTE, nka Violetta Alexander, Petitioner-Appellant, and Daniel O. COTE, Respondent-Respondent.
Violetta Alexander filed the briefs pro se. Thomas A. Bittner, Amy D. Fassler, and Schulte, Anderson, Downes, Aronson & Bittner, P.C., filed the brief for respondent.
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
Submitted November 3, 2022.
Multnomah County Circuit Court 20DR10396; Diana I. Stuart, Senior Judge.
Violetta Alexander filed the briefs pro se.
Thomas A. Bittner, Amy D. Fassler, and Schulte, Anderson, Downes, Aronson & Bittner, P.C., filed the brief for respondent.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Hellman, Judge.
ORTEGA, P. J.
Wife appeals the trial court's general judgment of dissolution of marriage, challenging the trial court's determinations regarding child custody, parenting time, and property division, among other things. She requests that we exercise our discretion to review this de novo, as we have the authority to under ORS 19.415(3)(b). However, wife has not designated a sufficient record on review for us to determine whether the court erred as she asserts. See ORS 19.365(5) ("If the record on appeal is not sufficient to allow the appellate court to review an assignment of error, the appellate court may decline to review the assignment of error and may dismiss the appeal if there are no other assignments of error that may be reviewed."); Russell v. Nikon, Inc., 207 Or.App. 266, 140 P.3d 1179, adh'd to on recons, 208 Or.App. 606, 145 P.3d 312 (2006), rev den, 342 Or. 299 (2007) (dismissing appeal under ORS 19.365(5) where appellant failed to provide an adequate record for review of his claim of error).
Appeal dismissed.