Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
Super. Ct. No. JJL23609
O'ROURKE, J.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County, Poli Flores, Jr., Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
Sixteen-year-old Mario G. entered a negotiated admission to transporting cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a).) The court declared him a ward, ordered him confined in juvenile hall for 60 days with credit for 42 days served, and placed on probation in Yuma, Arizona (his legal residence) until his 19th birthday. Mario appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
On November 16, 2006, a car driven by Jorge S. arrived at a United States Border Patrol checkpoint. Mario was a passenger. A Border Patrol agent questioned Jorge regarding his citizenship, and both Jorge and Mario handed over school identification cards and other documentation. As the agent examined the documents, Mario began sweating profusely. The agent obtained Jorge's consent to search the car. In a compartment behind the rear seat the agent found 14 bundles wrapped in cellophane and string. The bundles contained 35.4 pounds of cocaine with a street value of $1,132,800. At the time of the offense, Mario was on probation in Yuma, Arizona for a weapons offense.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to this possible but not arguable issue: whether court imposed reasonable terms and conditions of probation.
We granted Mario permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. A review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issue referred to pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Competent counsel has represented Mario on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
WE CONCUR: HALLER, Acting P. J., McINTYRE, J.