From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mariconda

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 30, 2008
195 N.J. 11 (N.J. 2008)

Opinion

May 30, 2008.


CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-390, concluding that ALAN J. MARICONDA of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.3(a) and (b) (failure to supervise non-attorney employees), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation), RPC 1.15(d) and Ride 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that the appropriate quantum of discipline is an admonition;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALAN J. MARICONDA is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Mariconda

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 30, 2008
195 N.J. 11 (N.J. 2008)
Case details for

In re Mariconda

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ALAN J. MARICONDA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

195 N.J. 11 (N.J. 2008)
947 A.2d 1215

Citing Cases

In re Weiner

; In re Mariconda, 195 N.J. 11 (2008) (admonition; attorney delegated his recordkeeping responsibilities to…

In re Weichsel

See, e.g., In re Mariconda, 195 N.J. 11 (2008) (admonition for attorney who delegated his recordkeeping…