Opinion
S141210
10-17-2018
MANRIQUEZ (ABELINO) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied (AA)
With respect to the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed on February 17, 2006, and amended January 10, 2008, all claims are denied on the merits. (See also In re Manriquez (2018) 5 Cal.5th 785.)
Claims 4 and 14, except to the extent they allege ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally barred under In re Waltreus (1965) 62 Cal.2d 218, 225, to the extent they were raised and rejected on appeal.
Claims 3, 5, 8, and 9, except to the extent they allege ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally barred under In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759, to the extent they could have been raised on appeal but were not.
Claims 10 and 11, except to the extent they allege ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally barred under In re Seaton (2004) 34 Cal.4th 193, 201, to the extent they could have been raised in the trial court but were not.
To the extent claim 14 alleges insufficiency of the evidence, it is not cognizable on habeas corpus. (In re Lindley (1947) 29 Cal.2d 709, 723.)
Corrigan, J., was absent and did not participate.