From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Manriquez

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 17, 2018
S141210 (Cal. Oct. 17, 2018)

Opinion

S141210

10-17-2018

MANRIQUEZ (ABELINO) ON H.C.


Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied (AA)

With respect to the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed on February 17, 2006, and amended January 10, 2008, all claims are denied on the merits. (See also In re Manriquez (2018) 5 Cal.5th 785.)

Claims 4 and 14, except to the extent they allege ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally barred under In re Waltreus (1965) 62 Cal.2d 218, 225, to the extent they were raised and rejected on appeal.

Claims 3, 5, 8, and 9, except to the extent they allege ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally barred under In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759, to the extent they could have been raised on appeal but were not.

Claims 10 and 11, except to the extent they allege ineffective assistance of counsel, are procedurally barred under In re Seaton (2004) 34 Cal.4th 193, 201, to the extent they could have been raised in the trial court but were not.

To the extent claim 14 alleges insufficiency of the evidence, it is not cognizable on habeas corpus. (In re Lindley (1947) 29 Cal.2d 709, 723.)

Corrigan, J., was absent and did not participate.


Summaries of

In re Manriquez

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 17, 2018
S141210 (Cal. Oct. 17, 2018)
Case details for

In re Manriquez

Case Details

Full title:MANRIQUEZ (ABELINO) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Oct 17, 2018

Citations

S141210 (Cal. Oct. 17, 2018)