From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Malotte

Supreme Court of California
Feb 27, 1956
46 Cal.2d 300 (Cal. 1956)

Opinion

Docket No. Crim. 5755.

February 27, 1956.

PROCEEDING in habeas corpus to secure release from custody. Writ denied.

Leslie C. Gillen and John R. Golden for Petitioner.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, Thomas C. Lynch, District Attorney (San Francisco), Norman Elkington, Chief Assistant District Attorney, and Walter H. Guibbini, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] This proceeding was instituted to secure petitioner's release on bail pending determination of her appeal in People v. Malotte, Crim. No. 5761. On January 27, 1956, we filed our decision affirming the judgment in People v. Malotte, ante, p. 59 [ 292 P.2d 517], which decision is now final. The order to show cause herein is therefore discharged, the petition for the writ is denied, and petitioner is remanded to custody forthwith.


Summaries of

In re Malotte

Supreme Court of California
Feb 27, 1956
46 Cal.2d 300 (Cal. 1956)
Case details for

In re Malotte

Case Details

Full title:In re MABEL MALOTTE, on Habeas Corpus

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 27, 1956

Citations

46 Cal.2d 300 (Cal. 1956)
293 P.2d 777

Citing Cases

People v. Kelsey

[2] Moreover, where the evidence shows nothing more than an entry of private premises by police officers and…