From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mahoney

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 15, 2011
No. 05-11-01055-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-11-01055-CV

Opinion Filed August 15, 2011.

Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 09-01370.

Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices MOSELEY and FILLMORE.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators contend the trial judge erred by rendering an order requiring them to appear in response to subpoenas after relators filed a motion for protective order in Ellis County. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. We conclude relators' petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus. The stay issued by this Court on August 12, 2011 shall remain in effect until 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 17, 2011.


Summaries of

In re Mahoney

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 15, 2011
No. 05-11-01055-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2011)
Case details for

In re Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MARK MAHONEY AND KAREN GRIFFIN, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Aug 15, 2011

Citations

No. 05-11-01055-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2011)