From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Macor

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 13, 2018
2018-1289 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2018)

Opinion

2018-1289

11-13-2018

IN RE: JAMES J. MACOR, Appellant

PERRY MATTHEW FONSECA, Law Office of Perry M. Fonseca, PC, Lawrenceville, NJ, argued for appellant. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/928,280.

JUDGMENT

PERRY MATTHEW FONSECA, Law Office of Perry M. Fonseca, PC, Lawrenceville, NJ, argued for appellant. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (HUGHES, SCHALL, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 13, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Macor

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 13, 2018
2018-1289 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2018)
Case details for

In re Macor

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JAMES J. MACOR, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 2018

Citations

2018-1289 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2018)