From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Macklin

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Jan 25, 2019
No. S252745 (Cal. Jan. 25, 2019)

Opinion

S252745

01-25-2019

MACKLIN ON DISCIPLINE


Recommended discipline imposed

The court orders that DAPHNE LORI MACKLIN (Respondent), State Bar Number 117189, is suspended from the practice of law in California for three years, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for three years subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of the first two years of probation, and Respondent will remain suspended until the following requirements are satisfied:

i. Respondent makes restitution to the following payees or such other recipient as may be designated by the Office of Probation or the State Bar Court (or reimburses the Client Security Fund, to the extent of any payment from the Fund to such payee, in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6140.5) and furnishes satisfactory proof to the State Bar's Office of Probation in Los Angeles:

(1) Nathaniel Saunders in the amount of $750 plus 10 percent interest per year from April 11, 2013;

(2) Robert Solla in the amount of $5,691.66 plus 10 percent interest per year from July 25, 2014; and

(3) Michael Coffman in the amount of $1,000 plus 10 percent interest per year from September 1, 2014.

ii. Respondent provides proof to the State Bar Court of rehabilitation, fitness to practice and present learning and ability in the general law. (Rules Proc. of State Bar, tit. IV, Stds. for Atty. Sanctions for Prof. Misconduct, std. 1.2(c)(1).)

2. Respondent must also comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on September 24, 2018.

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.

Respondent must also comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may result in disbarment or suspension.

Respondent must also maintain the records of compliance as required by the conditions of probation.

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment. One-third of the costs must be paid with Respondent's membership fees for each of the years 2020, 2021, and 2022. If Respondent fails to pay any installment as described above, or as may be modified in writing by the State Bar or the State Bar Court, the remaining balance is due and payable immediately.


Summaries of

In re Macklin

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Jan 25, 2019
No. S252745 (Cal. Jan. 25, 2019)
Case details for

In re Macklin

Case Details

Full title:MACKLIN ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

No. S252745 (Cal. Jan. 25, 2019)