From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mack

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jun 28, 2017
No. 10-17-00186-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 10-17-00186-CR

06-28-2017

IN RE CRAIG MACK


Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Craig Mack, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel McLennan County District Clerk Jon Gimble to provide him with forms to assist in filing for post-conviction relief. A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk, except to protect or enforce its jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004); In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d 874, 879 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding). We do not have jurisdiction to decide Mack's mandamus proceeding against the district clerk. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221; see also In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d at 879. Accordingly, we dismiss Mack's mandamus petition for want of jurisdiction.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Petition dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed June 28, 2017
[OT06]


Summaries of

In re Mack

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jun 28, 2017
No. 10-17-00186-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2017)
Case details for

In re Mack

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CRAIG MACK

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jun 28, 2017

Citations

No. 10-17-00186-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

In re Tennyson

To the extent Relator complains of the District Clerk, a district clerk is not a judge over which this Court…

In re Skinner

A district clerk is not a judge over which this Court has mandamus jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN.…