From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Macero

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jun 20, 2011
24 A.3d 593 (Vt. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2011-152, June Term, 2011

June 20, 2011

Original Jurisdiction Professional Responsibility Board PRB No. 2011.213.


ENTRY ORDER In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

¶ 1. In late April 2011, the Court received notice from disciplinary counsel that respondent, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Vermont, had been suspended from the practice of law in Massachusetts for a period of one year, the suspension to begin on May 8, 2011. Pursuant to A.O. 9, Rule 20.B, the Court issued an order notifying respondent of the suspension and offering respondent an opportunity to inform the Court, within 30 days of the order, why the imposition of identical discipline in this State would be unwarranted. Respondent failed to respond. Accordingly, pursuant to A.O. 9, Rule 20.D, the Court finds the Massachusetts adjudication of misconduct to be conclusive, and warrants imposition of the identical discipline in Vermont.

¶ 2. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Vermont for a period of one year, commencing on May 8, 2011. Respondent shall comply with all of the requirements of A.O. 9, Rule 23.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________ Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice

________________________________________ John A. Dooley, Associate Justice

________________________________________ Denise R. Johnson, Associate Justice

________________________________________ Marilyn S. Skoglund, Associate Justice

________________________________________ Brian L. Burgess, Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Macero

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jun 20, 2011
24 A.3d 593 (Vt. 2011)
Case details for

In re Macero

Case Details

Full title:In re Rosemary A. Macero, Esq

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Jun 20, 2011

Citations

24 A.3d 593 (Vt. 2011)
2011 Vt. 67