From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lyft Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 15, 2021
4:19-cv-02690-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2021)

Opinion

4:19-cv-02690-HSG

12-15-2021

In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litig. Plaintiffs,


APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE; ORDER (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)

I, Mark Byrne, an active member in good standing of the bar of U.S. District Ct., District of Mass., hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the Northern District of California representing: Rick Keiner in the above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is Vincent Cheng, an attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office within the State of California. Local co-counsel's bar number is: SBN 230827 .

260 Franklin St., Ste 1860, Boston, MA 02110

100 Pine St., Suite 1250, San Francisco, CA 94111

My address of record

Local co-counsel's address of record

(617) 398-5600

(510) 543-0489

My telephone # of record

Local co-counsel's telephone # of record

mark@blockleviton.com

vincent@blockleviton.com

My email address of record

Local co-counsel's email address of record

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: 706997.

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said bar is attached to this application.

I have been granted pro hac vice admission by the Court 0 times in the 12 months preceding this application.

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local

Rules. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of Mark Byrne is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.


Summaries of

In re Lyft Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 15, 2021
4:19-cv-02690-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2021)
Case details for

In re Lyft Sec. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litig. Plaintiffs,

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

Citations

4:19-cv-02690-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2021)