From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re L.V

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 27, 2002
813 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 2D01-1713.

March 27, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Katherine G. Essrig, Judge.

Shea T. Moxon, Tampa, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tanya E. DiFilippo, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

No appearance by Guardian Ad Litem Program.


B.V. challenges the trial court's order finding his twin daughters, L.V. and S.V., dependent as to him. B.V. argues, and the Department concedes, that the trial court erred in admitting a significant amount of evidence that was inadmissible hearsay. See In the Interest of AC, 751 So.2d 667, 669 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Williams v. Dep't of Health Rehabilitative Servs., 589 So.2d 359, 360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Without this inadmissible evidence, there is insufficient evidence to find L.V. and S.V. dependent as to B.V. Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order of dependency as to B.V. and remand for the Department to return L.V. and S.V. to B.V.'s care.

The mother of L.V. and S.V. consented to an order of dependency as to her. The dependency of the children as to the mother is not at issue in this appeal.

Reversed.

ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

In re L.V

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 27, 2002
813 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

In re L.V

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF L.V. AND S.V., MINOR CHILDREN; B.V., Appellant, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 27, 2002

Citations

813 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)